Below is a comparative analysis of the main differences between the platforms of Dominique Laverdure (Vision Mont-Tremblant) and Pascal De Bellefeuille (Ensemble Mont-Tremblant). This analysis, which examined all the responses received, was carried out by a professional Google artificial intelligence model.
The following analysis was not written by Les Amis: the two platforms present fundamentally different approaches to the governance of Mont-Tremblant. Dominique Laverdure’s platform is focused on continuity and action based on established plans, while Pascal De Bellefeuille favours a pause and re-evaluation approach.
Urban Planning Approach: the most significant difference lies in their approach to the Ville’s master development plan.
Pascal De Bellefeuille
proposes to suspend and re-evaluate the current plan. Their position is that “a complete analysis of the urban plan project, submitted by the current administration, is necessary before its implementation.” They are wary of densification, stating that “excessive densification is not a solution,” but do not offer alternative objectives or metrics. Their approach is reactive and consultative.
Dominique Laverdure
is actively implementing a revised urban plan, designated as “(Draft Regulation No (2025)-236).” Their platform is a defense and explanation of this plan, which favors “smart and balanced densification of existing cores while promoting resort development to preserve the unique character of our Ville.” The platform commits to concrete environmental objectives, such as “Conserving at least 40% of the territory protected by 2030, in accordance with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework” and “reducing GHG emissions by 37.5% by 2030.” Their approach is proactive and data-driven.
Infrastructure Strategy: the candidates’ strategies for managing municipal infrastructure also show a clear divide.
Pascal De Bellefeuille
believes the first step is to conduct a new assessment of all infrastructure to determine its capacity before addressing new needs. Their commitment is: “Before responding to new needs, Ensemble Mont-Tremblant will conduct a complete assessment of the status of existing water and sewer infrastructures to ensure their capacity, the relevance, and the feasibility of making modifications.” Their approach is focused on evaluation before action.
Dominique Laverdure
presents a detailed, long-term strategy that is already underway. This includes “A three-year capital expenditure program (2022-2024)” and “A master plan for the state of infrastructures over 20 to 30 years, to anticipate needs, restore aging installations, and strengthen climate resilience.” Their objective is continuous, long-term planning.
Project Management and Governance: the two teams diverge on how they would manage key local files and projects.
Pascal De Bellefeuille
favors a more cautious and deliberative process. For the B&T (Beach and Tennis Club) and other acquired properties, “A table of sages will be created for recommendations on this subject.” For the Old Village, they intend to “review all public consultations and reports already submitted to citizens” before creating a new plan. This suggests a governance style that prioritizes re-evaluation over the execution of existing plans.
Dominique Laverdure
proposes immediate and concrete actions. For the Beach and Tennis Club (B&T), “A vision development committee will be established in the fall.” For the Old Village, they have a specific plan to ” convert Félix Calvé into a cultural community center.” On the legal front, they have invested in “new internal expertise, a dedicated lawyer” to manage the proceedings proactively.
To read the full responses from the mayoral candidates, please click here.